How ALC uses Claude Cowork to deliver better-value legal consultancy

Faster drafting is useful. Knowing whether a contract actually fits your business is where legal judgement matters. In this interview, ALC founder Amy Kafetz explains how we combine Claude and Cowork with commercial context, contract playbooks and a lawyer’s review to help clients get more value from legal consultancy.

Contract pages and a gold pen connected to an abstract digital panel by fine gold threads.
AI-generated editorial illustration.

AI helps us prepare, compare and draft. A lawyer reads every term, checks the context and validates the work before it reaches the client.

Less assembly time

Faster preparation on suitable, repeatable matters.

More business context

Templates and playbooks shaped around how you operate.

Human accountability

Every work product checked before client delivery.

Interview answers edited for clarity from Amy’s supplied account. The workflow takeaways are practical guidance from the ALC team.

What prompted you to explore Claude Cowork?

Amy Kafetz / Founder, Adaptable Legal Counsel

We became interested in Cowork in early 2026. Headlines about sharp falls in legal and accounting software shares made us look more closely at what it could do. The attraction was practical: could it help us produce a useful first draft and organise a workflow, rather than simply answer questions?

We also needed to assess the subscription against our data-security requirements. When we bought the plan we selected, the minimum purchase was five seats. We needed two, so we ended up with three spare. Even with that cost, the value to our workflow has been substantial.

Timeline and plan update: Cowork launched as a research preview on 12 January 2026. The widely reported legal-software share sell-off followed in February. ALC’s five-seat purchase describes its experience at the time; Anthropic’s current Team guidance lists a two-member minimum. Sources 1–3.

Had you used AI before Cowork?

Amy Kafetz / Founder, Adaptable Legal Counsel

Yes. We started using AI assistance in late 2024, but the results were hit and miss. We made six attempts to build a platform that would automate a substantial amount of in-house counsel work. Each time, we ran into roadblocks around the accuracy we needed.

That experience helped us separate useful assistance from dependable legal work. A document can look polished and still miss something commercially important. Today, we use AI for parts of the process, with a lawyer responsible for checking the output.

What is the biggest issue AI still needs help with?

A folded black paper swan on contract pages, symbolising an unexpected obligation.
AI-generated editorial illustration. “Black swan clause” is ALC’s shorthand, not a legal classification.
A clause can be well written and still be wrong for the service being bought.

Amy Kafetz / Founder, Adaptable Legal Counsel

We call it the ‘black swan clause’. That is our shorthand for an unexpected obligation that does not fit the services our client is actually providing. It is not a formal legal category.

Many of our clients sell services to larger enterprises. Those customers often insist on their own paperwork, which may have been written to cover many different purchases. A term can be sensible for one supplier and inappropriate for another.

For example, imagine a recruitment agency being asked to accept responsibility for maintaining the customer’s IT systems. That is an illustrative example, but it shows the problem: a broad obligation in the agreement may extend beyond the service being bought.

AI can do a lot of the comparison and initial analysis. We still read every term of every contract and check whether it is appropriate in context. We also look at how clauses interact. A tidy summary is not a substitute for that review.

Where does AI deliver the most value for your clients?

From business context to reviewed work

  1. 01 / CONTEXTUnderstand the business

    Service scope, delivery, payment and priorities.

  2. 02 / PREPARATIONAI-assisted first draft

    Approved template and explicit instructions.

  3. 03 / JUDGEMENTLawyer review

    Every term, assumptions and commercial fit.

  4. 04 / DELIVERYRefine and validate

    Resolved questions and checked work product.

Amy Kafetz / Founder, Adaptable Legal Counsel

Playbooks and initial contract drafting are particularly useful. We start with an appropriate boilerplate and interview the client about the business: what it provides, how delivery works, how it charges and where it needs flexibility.

We then ask AI to prepare a first draft using the template and that context. It is draft one. We refine it, check it and adjust it as the commercial decisions become clearer.

In our experience, that first pass can save hours of preparation on suitable matters. Smaller agreements, including routine NDAs, can take considerably less drafting time than before. The benefit for the client is less time spent assembling documents and more capacity for advice, negotiation and decisions.

The saving varies with the document and engagement. It does not remove the need for review or mean every matter has a lower fixed fee.

What still frustrates you about AI-generated documents?

Amy Kafetz / Founder, Adaptable Legal Counsel

Multi-level lists in Word. We have had outputs that look beautiful but do not use Word’s native numbering properly. When you edit them, the document becomes frustrating to maintain.

That is our experience with particular outputs, rather than a claim that the tools can never create native numbering. The test is whether the document works when the client or counterparty edits it.

Where do you see AI taking legal workflows next?

Amy Kafetz / Founder, Adaptable Legal Counsel

We expect less legal time to be needed for some recurring tasks. The amount will depend on the organisation and the work. Where a business has established playbooks and repeatable processes, AI has a clearer set of rules to work from.

Where every agreement needs bespoke terms, the opportunity to standardise is smaller. There can still be useful savings in preparation, but more of the work depends on commercial judgement and negotiation.

Our advice is to put the legal operations your business actually needs in place. Agree preferred terms, realistic fallbacks and escalation rules, while preserving the flexibility your customers require. A rigid playbook that does not fit your sales model can create its own problems.

What should a client expect from an AI-enabled legal consultancy?

Amy Kafetz / Founder, Adaptable Legal Counsel

They should expect us to understand their business and take responsibility for the work we deliver. ALC is AI-enabled: we use AI as a tool, and every piece of work product is checked and validated by a human.

For contract work, that includes reading every term and assessing it against the service, commercial priorities and agreed risk position. Our clients receive reviewed legal support, not an unchecked AI response.

Get more value from your legal support.

Need help with recurring contracts, enterprise customer terms or a consistent negotiating approach? Our in-house legal consultancy combines commercial advice with AI-assisted preparation and human review.

We also offer contract playbooks and legal operations and AI legal training for teams introducing Claude into their work. We agree the scope, capacity and responsibilities for your engagement.

Discuss your contracts or AI workflow

Questions about AI-enabled legal support

Can Claude Cowork replace a lawyer’s contract review?+
ALC uses Claude and Cowork to assist preparation and analysis. A lawyer still reads every term, assesses the commercial context and validates the work before delivery.
How can contract playbooks improve AI-assisted legal work?+
Playbooks give the workflow approved positions, fallbacks and escalation rules. They help make recurring work more consistent while reserving exceptions and decisions for human review.
Can ALC help our team introduce Claude into legal workflows?+
ALC offers AI legal training and contract playbook support. We can discuss suitable tasks, practical workflows and review responsibilities alongside your commercial legal needs.

Sources and product notes

  1. Anthropic: Introducing Labs, 13 January 2026. Records Cowork’s research-preview launch the previous day.
  2. Reuters: software and data-company sell-off, 3 February 2026. Reporting connects the sell-off with Anthropic’s new automation tools.
  3. Anthropic: Team-plan requirements. Current guidance lists a two-member minimum; check terms before purchasing.
  4. Anthropic: commercial-product model training. Inputs and outputs are not used for training by default; feedback or opt-in can change this.

Product information checked on 12 October 2026. Plans, controls and capabilities can change. This article describes ALC’s experience, not a benchmark or guarantee of savings. It provides general information rather than advice on a particular matter. Claude and Cowork are Anthropic products; this article does not imply an Anthropic partnership or endorsement.

Regulatory status

Important information about how our services are regulated

Adaptable Legal Counsel is an unregulated legal services business. It is not authorised or regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

No statement on this website should be read as saying that Adaptable Legal Counsel is authorised or regulated by the SRA. The regulatory status of any individual adviser will be confirmed separately where relevant before engagement.

We provide non-reserved legal services only. We do not conduct litigation, exercise rights of audience, carry out reserved conveyancing, probate or notarial work, administer oaths, provide immigration advice, claims management services or regulated financial services, or hold client money.

SRA compulsory minimum terms insurance and the SRA Compensation Fund do not apply to Adaptable Legal Counsel. Before engagement we explain our insurance arrangements, complaints process and any complaint routes that apply to the work.